| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
   |
Posted - 2012.10.28 20:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Zero Audier wrote:I'm getting tired of people talking about this. Just hire some dam mercs with all those iskies you made from mining  .
I'm getting tired of James and his crew posting "miner" whine threads and pretending it's miners.
Actually can't decide if this James and company player action to point out the flaws with:
NPC Corps?
Mechanics of mining?
Merc contracts and kill rights?
Bounties?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 15:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:This thread is evidence of WHY many people don't like high sec miners. No simply bumping a miner is somehow the end of the world, because orbiting stuff is hard.
Actually, this thread is probably the result of James or one of his sycophants efforts (not bumping, typing it).
It's my guess that all these :words: by james and co. is just an elaborate set up to drum up attention to this alt (J315) of someone else for the next CSM election.
Hi-Sec miners being the unfortunate paper this message is being written on.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 16:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Because all the hundreds (thousands?) of miners in game are represented by the 1/2 dozen who post in GD (the most radical anti-bumpers probably being James or his sycophants)? Yeah... I also go off the fact that hundreds nay throusands died to us because they didnt fit any tank. They still don't fit a tank. All they did was whine on the forums till CCP fitted a tank for them. Miners have never adapted to any threat in the 7 or 8 years that barges have been in the game.
Gotcha, you (generic "you") have ganked all miners in the game, and all miners suck.
Random generalizations a go.
Gotcha.
Gotta admit, it must be a warm and fuzzy feeling to be able to single out a group and label them all with 100% assurance. I also don't believe (could be wrong, don't have any friends in CCP/CSM) the ship changes were in response to the whine threads (some of which I *do* believe were planted as red herrings).
I kinda think the mining ship changes were in the works for a long time and it was just serendipity that they came out when they did.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 16:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Out of 600 miners killed in the caldari ice interdiction not a single one had a tank fitted.
Out of the 1000+ killed in the first gal ice interdiction fewer than 10% had any sort of a tank fitted.
In the last ice interdiction they had, unsuprisingly, no tank fitted to most of them.
I think its safe to say that the vast bulk of miners do not fit a tank. But by all means go out and run your own tests.
Nope, I'll take your numbers as gospel as presented.
My original point being that out of how many got destroyed, how many actually came to the forums and raged? 1%? 2%? Hell, go out crazy and say 5%???
Because 95% *NOT* raging is not a bad turnout (if it even *was* that low - I'm thinking out of all the thousands you killed the actuall number was <2%).
baltec1 wrote:Also its funny that barges only got an update after the ice interdictions started and one of those changes was to add more base EHP.
Serendipity is a funny thing.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 17:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote: Our KBs were let down by the miners though, of course.
because KB > ?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 17:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:
Nope, I'll take your numbers as gospel as presented.
My original point being that out of how many got destroyed, how many actually came to the forums and raged? 1%? 2%? Hell, go out crazy and say 5%???
Because 95% *NOT* raging is not a bad turnout (if it even *was* that low - I'm thinking out of all the thousands you killed the actuall
It was enough to convince CCP to buff the EHP of a ship . . .
Do you have proof that it was actually the "miners" whining that resulted in this change by CCP? Not trying to be pedantic here, but tbqh - the whole "miner in hi-sec = the devil" seems like a manufactured controversy to me.
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:[I'm afraid that you have woefully misunderstood the purpose of the New Order of Hisec
Which has been manufactured entirely to get J315 (an alt of whoever) elected to the CSM...
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 17:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Do you have proof that it was actually the "miners" whining that resulted in this change by CCP? Not trying to be pedantic here, but tbqh - the whole "miner in hi-sec = the devil" seems like a manufactured controversy to me.
No update to barges for over 6 years Goons do ice iterdictions Forums explode with miner rants for months CCP buff barges. Yea, I cant see any link here...
Summer of Rage, CCP starts working on FiS, **** changes and all the while the game still goes on.
So, again, any proof or not?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 18:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:We call this burrying your head in the sand. Try not to swallow too much while you yell "lalalala".
And I call that "avoiding the question". Seriously, do you know or not?
Proximity =/= Causation.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 18:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:baltec1 wrote:We call this burrying your head in the sand. Try not to swallow too much while you yell "lalalala". And I call that "avoiding the question". Seriously, do you know or not? Proximity =/= Causation. You already got the answer. Its up to you if you want to dismiss it because you don't like the truth.
So yeah, you don't *know*, nor have any proof, that the changes weren't in the pipeline for months before any of those actions? thanks for the clarification.
TheTrue Acolyte wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:I'm sure they can deal with swallowing some stuff while yelling. "Blessed are the swallowers, for by their actions they show their love for the Saviour of HiSec." - The Gospel of James 315, The Book of Gratitude, Chapter 6 Verse 4
Wouldn't be the first person to call themselves "saviour"...
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 18:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:This kind of unfavourable comparison to the Savior of Hisec always distresses me and my fellow agents greatly, not to mention James 315 himself. I mean, when will miners think of something original to say?
A) Not a miner;
B) It's pretty original, so far as I know it's the first time he's been compared to Khoresh. May not be the first time he's been compared to a person suffering delusions, but definitely first time to Khoresh.
C) Glad to help distress some agents.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 19:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:This kind of unfavourable comparison to the Savior of Hisec always distresses me and my fellow agents greatly, not to mention James 315 himself. I mean, when will miners think of something original to say? Maybe they need CCP to do it for them as well.
He was trying to imply that I was a miner - and no, thanks, don't need anyone to carry my messages for me.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
| |
|